I didn't have to work this morning, so I took the opportunity to enjoy a cup of coffee and read the newspaper. In doing so, I found
this interesting article. Some points in the article can maybe give you an idea of where education is at now in VN (I'm not quite enough of an expert to give a highly detailed account—yet! Just you wait).
According to the draft, by 2020, 80 per cent of Vietnamese should graduate from senior secondary school, 100 per cent of districts should have regular educational centres, 95 per cent of communes and wards should have study centres and 65 per cent of labourers should have got training.
Sometimes it's difficult for me to gauge just how many kids make it beyond primary school (which is grades 1-5), but I think 80% is a decent figure to reach for. But more importantly, there is a definite disparity between schools/facilities in the city and in the countryside; focusing to bridge that quality gap seems really important to me.
The draft also set targets that 99 per cent of children and 90 per cent of ethnic minority children should attend primary schools at the correct age, 70 per cent of disabled people and 95 per cent of poor children should receive assistance to attend school.
The minorities and hill tribes (
all the peoples in this list, except for Kinh/Việt, seem to get the short end of stick sometimes. A greater support system for them would be great, but I'm not sure how achievable that 90% figure is (in the near future). Oh, and WUSC Việt Nam has also been involved in a project related to this:
click here to watch a video!Professor Dr Nguyen Huu Chau, director of the Viet Nam Education Institute, the institution that compiled the draft, said that the draft had 11 solutions to help implement the above targets, including solutions to renew educational management and affirm the key role of teachers and principals in the education system.
I sometimes wonder about these sorts of vague mentions of "solutions." Does, "renew educational management and affirm the key role of teachers and principals," just mean clamp down and be more strict? It very well could mean that! Classrooms here are so different; kids can't really ask questions. Whatever is taught to them, they take at face value—and that's all there is to it. (Of course, other country's systems aren't perfect either.. but it would be nice if Việt Nam's educational system was more willing to accept a bit of open-mindedness and free thinking)
The draft should have criteria to build some international – level universities and should focus more on a moral education for students, said some.
More internationally recognized universities would certainly be a good thing, but a focus on improving primary, secondary and high school education first might be more practical! Việt Nam's primary education is pretty good, I'd say, and it's the reason why the country has a high rate of literacy. But still, I think too many kids miss out on secondary and/or high school education. I guess all levels of education can be developed simultaneously, though, if it's all planned out adequately.
Anyways, read the article! It's interesting.